The Vivo X80 Pro has just gone global, and it is ready to take on the best flagships on the market. It is unquestionably a fantastic phone, even though there may be a better variation on the way in the second half of the year. Meanwhile, the Vivo X80 Pro is the company's most advanced phone for the worldwide market, and it may be coming to Europe shortly. As a result, a comparison of this smartphone to the most prominent flagships from other brands could be really valuable at this time. The Samsung Galaxy S22+ was selected for this comparison since it is the most advanced Samsung flagship in the same price range as the Vivo X80 Pro.
Design
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus has a fantastic design that is both unique and different from the majority of other flagships on the market. The camera module is the most gorgeous part of the phone, but it's also made of high-quality materials: Gorilla Glass Victus Plus-protected glass on the front and back, and aluminium on the frame. However, even in terms of design, the Vivo X80 Pro is a wonderful match for this gadget. It’s curved screen is incredibly attractive, yet its large camera module may not be to everyone's taste. It's also available in two colour schemes, with ceramic and leather backs. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus, on the other hand, is a smaller, lighter, and thinner phone. With IP68 certification, both handsets are waterproof.
Display
Despite the fact that Samsung is the most popular display manufacturer in the Android world, the Vivo X80 Pro is the best option if you want the most advanced display. First and foremost, it boasts a larger display, measuring 6.78 inches diagonally. It also features LTPO 3.0 technology, which allows for an adaptable refresh rate of 1 to 120 Hz and very low energy consumption. Last but not least, it has a greater 1440 x 3200 pixel Quad HD+ resolution. The display outperforms the competition in terms of smoothness control and even level of detail. The Vivo X80 Pro has a disadvantage in terms of size, as it has a larger display, whereas the Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus is significantly slimmer and more compact.
Specifications and Software
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 mobile platform, which is built at 4 nm and runs at a maximum frequency of 3 GHz, powers the Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus and the Vivo X80 Pro, but there is a variant of the Samsung flagship for select markets that is equipped with an inferior Samsung Exynos 2200, which is built at 4 nm and runs at a maximum frequency of 2.8 GHz. If you live in some parts of the world, such as Europe, the Vivo X80 Pro will be a better choice. Another point to mention is that the X80 Pro has up to 12 GB of RAM, but the Galaxy S22 Plus only has 8 GB. Both phones come preloaded with Android 12, but the Galaxy is more likely to get lengthier software support because to Samsung's actual upgrade policy, which guarantee more years of upgrades (Vivo currently stops at three years for the global market).
Camera
There is no doubt that the Vivo X80 Pro is the best camera phone in this competition. It has a superior main camera with a brighter f/1.6 focal aperture and laser focusing, for starters. It also has an 8 MP periscope camera with 5x optical zoom, unlike the Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus. Last but not least, it boasts a 48 MP ultrawide sensor, which is superior to the previous model.
Battery
The Vivo X80 Pro has a larger battery, and despite having a larger display with a higher resolution, it is likely to last longer on a single charge in many situations. It also charges faster because to its 80W fast wired charging and 50W fast wireless charging capabilities. As a result, this phone has a longer battery life and faster charging speeds.
Price
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus costs over €1000/$1065 in India and Europe, while the Vivo X80 Pro is still unavailable in Europe and costs around $1031/€968 in India. Due to its superior display, greater cameras, larger battery, and faster charging, the Vivo flagship is actually a superior gadget, while the Galaxy S22 Plus will receive lengthier software support. Which would you choose?

0 Comments